Home / Guides / IFTTT vs Make

IFTTT vs Make

A side-by-side look at 2 AI & ML tools for 2026 — the verdict, pricing, ratings, features, and what readers think.

IFTTT
ifttt.com
Best for individuals and small teams automating everyday apps, mobile and smart-home tasks

No-code automation that connects 1,000+ apps, devices and AI agents with simple trigger-and-action Applets.

Visit IFTTT
Make
make.com
Best for ops and marketing teams automating multi-step, multi-app workflows visually

Visual no-code platform for building AI agents and automated workflows across 3,500+ apps.

Visit Make

Pricing compared

IFTTT
$2.09/mo
  • Free tier Yes
  • Free trial —
Make
$10.59/mo
  • Free tier Yes
  • Free trial Free plan, 1,000 credits/mo, no card

Head to head

IFTTT Make
Starting price $2.09/mo $10.59/mo
Free tier Yes Yes
Free trial — Free plan, 1,000 credits/mo, no card
Platforms Web · iOS · Android Web · API
Founded 2010 —
HQ San Francisco, USA —

Pros & cons

IFTTT
Pros
  • Free plan includes unlimited Applets, all 1,000+ services and 1,000 credits a month.
  • Very low entry price: paid plans start at USD 2.09 per month billed annually.
  • Large library of ready-made Applets from IFTTT, partners and the community.
  • Strong mobile and smart-home coverage with iOS and Android apps.
  • AI Agent, AI-generated Applets and an MCP server connect it to AI assistants.
Cons
  • Credit-based pricing means heavy or AI-powered Applets can use up the monthly allowance.
  • Free plan polls services about once an hour, so triggers are not instant.
  • Less suited to complex branching or data-transformation workflows than developer-oriented tools.
  • Multiple accounts per service require the top Pro+ plan.
Make
Pros
  • Visual canvas makes branching, loops and error handling easy to see.
  • Large integration library (3,500+ apps) plus custom API connections.
  • Lets you add JavaScript or Python when no-code modules fall short.
  • Free plan has no time limit and needs no credit card.
  • Security posture includes SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and GDPR compliance.
Cons
  • Credit-based pricing is harder to forecast than flat per-seat plans.
  • The free plan limits (credits and active scenarios) are tight for real use.
  • Complex scenarios take time to learn compared with simple trigger-action tools.