Home / Guides / Ashby vs Figma

Ashby vs Figma

A side-by-side look at 2 Productivity tools for 2026 — the verdict, pricing, ratings, features, and what readers think.

Ashby
ashbyhq.com
Best for startups and growth-stage companies that want ATS, scheduling, sourcing and analytics in one recruiting system

All-in-one recruiting software that combines ATS, scheduling, sourcing CRM and analytics, with AI built into each step.

Visit Ashby
Figma
figma.com
Best for UI/UX designers and product teams

Collaborative interface design, in the browser.

Visit Figma

Pricing compared

Ashby
$400/mo
  • Free tier No
  • Free trial No free trial listed; contact sales for a demo
Figma
$16/user/mo
  • Free tier Yes
  • Free trial 30 days

Head to head

Ashby Figma
Starting price $400/mo $16/user/mo
Free tier No Yes
Free trial No free trial listed; contact sales for a demo 30 days
Platforms Web · API —
Founded 2018 2012
HQ — San Francisco, CA
Team size — 1000-5000

Pros & cons

Ashby
Pros
  • ATS, scheduling, sourcing CRM and analytics live in one product, so there is no data sync between tools.
  • Foundations plan has a published starting price of USD 400 per month for up to 100 employees.
  • Sourcing includes multi-step email and LinkedIn sequences and 200 included email lookups per month.
  • AI features cover candidate search, outreach personalization, application review and talent rediscovery.
  • Shows a SOC 2 badge and offers GDPR retention and consent rules plus audit logs.
Cons
  • No free plan or free trial is listed, so evaluation starts with a sales conversation.
  • Plus and Enterprise plans have no public price.
  • Some features, such as AI Notetaker and extra email lookups, are paid add-ons.
  • Advanced scheduling is a paid add-on on the Plus plan.
  • The pricing page shows no data residency information.
Figma
Pros
  • Industry-standard for UI/UX design
  • Excellent real-time collaboration
  • Powerful prototyping tools
  • FigJam whiteboard included
  • Strong developer handoff via Dev Mode
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve than Canva
  • More expensive for larger teams
  • Browser-based with limited offline access
  • Fewer pre-made templates for marketing