Activepieces vs Make
A side-by-side look at 2 AI & ML tools for 2026 — the verdict, pricing, ratings, features, and what readers think.
activepieces.com
Best for teams wanting open-source, self-hostable automation with AI agents
Open-source workflow automation and AI agents your whole team can build, with self-hosting on every plan.
Visit Activepieces
make.com
Best for ops and marketing teams automating multi-step, multi-app workflows visually
Visual no-code platform for building AI agents and automated workflows across 3,500+ apps.
Visit MakePricing compared
Activepieces
$20/mo
Make
$10.59/mo
Head to head
| Activepieces | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $20/mo | $10.59/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Free plan, no card; 1,000 credits per month | Free plan, 1,000 credits/mo, no card |
| Platforms | Web · Self-hosted · API | Web · API |
Pros & cons
Activepieces
Pros
- Open-source MIT core that can be self-hosted with Docker or Kubernetes.
- Unlimited flows on every plan; a run is one credit however many steps it has.
- 770+ open-source integrations plus HTTP and webhook pieces for any API.
- Agents, chat, flows and tables share one workspace, with MCP server support.
- Approval steps let you gate actions that touch money, customers or production.
Cons
- AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 credits unless you bring your own AI keys on Plus or above.
- Free plan is limited to 1,000 credits and 5 users.
- SSO and standard roles start at the USD 200/month Team plan.
- The company says its SOC 2 program is still in progress, with no certification claimed.
Make
Pros
- Visual canvas makes branching, loops and error handling easy to see.
- Large integration library (3,500+ apps) plus custom API connections.
- Lets you add JavaScript or Python when no-code modules fall short.
- Free plan has no time limit and needs no credit card.
- Security posture includes SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and GDPR compliance.
Cons
- Credit-based pricing is harder to forecast than flat per-seat plans.
- The free plan limits (credits and active scenarios) are tight for real use.
- Complex scenarios take time to learn compared with simple trigger-action tools.