Firecrawl vs Serper
A side-by-side look at 2 AI & ML tools for 2026 — the verdict, pricing, ratings, features, and what readers think.
F
firecrawl.dev
Best for Developers building AI agents and RAG apps that need clean, LLM-ready data from any website through one API.
The open-source web data API that lets AI agents search, scrape and interact with the live web.
Visit Firecrawl
S
serper.dev
Best for Developers who want cheap, fast Google results as a search tool for agents, RAG pipelines and SEO scripts.
A fast, low-cost Google Search API that gives AI agents and apps structured SERP data in one to two seconds.
Visit SerperPricing compared
Firecrawl
$16/mo
Serper
$0.3/1k queries
Head to head
| Firecrawl | Serper | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16/mo | $0.3/1k queries |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Free plan with 1,000 credits per month, no credit card required | 2,500 free queries, no credit card required |
| Platforms | API · CLI · Web · Self-hosted | API · Web |
Pros & cons
Firecrawl
Pros
- One API covers search, scrape, crawl, map and interaction, so agents need fewer separate tools.
- Returns clean markdown or JSON that cuts input tokens versus raw HTML.
- Open source with a very active GitHub community, which lowers lock-in risk.
- Free plan of 1,000 credits a month with no credit card makes prototyping easy.
- Connects to AI agents and MCP clients with a single command.
Cons
- Shared credit system means search, JSON extraction and interaction cost different amounts, so budgeting takes monitoring.
- Pages that return 403 or 404 errors still cost 1 credit.
- Benchmark and token-saving claims are vendor-published, not independently verified.
- Aimed at developers; there is no end-user research interface.
- SSO and SCIM are limited to the Enterprise plan.
Serper
Pros
- Google-quality results (organic, knowledge graph, answer box, PAA) through a simple JSON API.
- Among the cheapest per-query pricing in the category, from $0.30 per 1,000 queries at volume.
- 2,500 free queries with no credit card make evaluation risk-free.
- Covers Search, Images, News, Maps, Places, Videos, Shopping, Scholar, Patents and Autocomplete.
- Ships as a ready-made tool in LangChain, so wiring it into an agent takes minutes.
Cons
- Returns snippets and links only; you still need a scraper or extraction API for full page content.
- Not an agent-native or semantic index, so results are not pre-chunked or token-optimised for LLMs.
- Depends on Google results, which makes it a wrapper rather than an independent search index.
- The homepage does not publish rate limits, credit expiry or company details such as HQ and founding year.
Features compared
| Firecrawl | Serper | |
|---|---|---|
| Plans & pricing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Pricing model | Usage-based API credits | Per usage |
| Integrations & extensibility | ||
| Public API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |